Teams

Transfer/Refund

2025 40&Over Women · Hold

15 players · average NTRP 3.21 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Hold have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Diana Gatschet
published 4
3.07
Hitomi Rose
published 3.5
3.02
Rie Bohn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.97
Lorri Ahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Kavitha Shastry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Fumie Ishizawa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Lisa Bohen
published
2.80
Choi Fei Ko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Annie Yao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Marilyn Wong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Darcy Pancir
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Helen Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.46
Sandra Wang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Keiko Kita
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
NANCY Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Wang + Marilyn Wong2543% games+8.6% vs expected
Helen Cheng + Marilyn Wong2542% games−1.3% vs expected
Darcy Pancir + Kavitha Shastry314 matchesnot enough data
NANCY Lee + Fumie Ishizawa123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Gatschet
57W–28L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Hitomi Rose
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Rie Bohn
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Lorri Ahl
104W–81L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kavitha Shastry
34W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Fumie Ishizawa
39W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Lisa Bohen
44W–26L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Choi Fei Ko
85W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Annie Yao
22W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Marilyn Wong
28W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Darcy Pancir
34W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Helen Cheng
11W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
Sandra Wang
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Keiko Kita
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
NANCY Lee
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.