Teams

Naples Bay Club / Adiutori

2026 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMary Miranda-Del Rossi / Nicki Sebold vs Stephanie Foley / Sonia Denoncourt3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDana Wagoner vs Jane Jhanji6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiana Wong / Nannette Staropoli vs Cynthia George / Charleen Bridgett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDayna Webre / MacKenzie Rickman vs Sara Wachs / Michelle Rogers4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Nannette Staropoli vs Stephanie Foley / Sonia Denoncourt6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDiana Wong vs Jane Jhanji7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNada Pivcevic / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi vs Carolyn Matje / Kate Corr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Maurer / Mackenzie Rickman vs Tara Newhall / Mira Rochford6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-12vs Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / NewhallSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Nannette Staropoli vs Cynthia George / Jane Jhanji6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDiana Wong vs Michelle Rogers6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNicki Sebold / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi vs Sara Wachs / Sonia Denoncourt0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammy Finlinson / Amy Gardner vs Tara Newhall / Carolyn Matje2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Nannette Staropoli vs Charleen Bridgett / Kristy Cardina6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChrissy Rogers vs Michelle Rogers3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Wong / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi vs Tara Newhall / Sonia Denoncourt4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTracy Maurer / Nicki Sebold vs Carolyn Matje / Kate Corr6-7, 2-6
2026-01-29vs Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / NewhallSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Nicki Sebold vs Kirsten Forbush / Cynthia George5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChrissy Rogers vs Michelle Rogers6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNannette Staropoli / Jennifer Hansen vs Jane Jhanji / Stephanie Foley4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNada Pivcevic / Dayna Webre vs Flora Rodriguez / Kate Corr4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Nannette Staropoli vs Kate Corr / Cynthia George4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichelle Rogers vs Stephanie Rodriguez - (DQ)*3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicki Sebold / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi vs Sara Wachs / Sonia Denoncourt6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDayna Webre / MacKenzie Rickman vs Kirsten Forbush / Mira Rochford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-22vs Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / NewhallSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNannette Staropoli / Dana Wagoner vs Cynthia George / Kristy Cardina6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Michelle Rogers1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Miranda-Del Rossi / Nicki Sebold vs Jane Jhanji / Stephanie Foley6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMackenzie Rickman / Tracy Maurer vs Tara Newhall / Flora Rodriguez6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-08vs Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / NewhallSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Nannette Staropoli vs Cynthia George / Stephanie Foley6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Flora Rodriguez7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicki Sebold / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi vs Cheryl Cohen / Jane Jhanji6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Wong / Tracy Maurer vs Sara Wachs / Sonia Denoncourt4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / Newhall44181436300
2Naples Bay Club / Adiutori44141842299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Stephanie Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.34
Nannette Staropoli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Dana Wagoner
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4.5
4.31
Nicki Sebold
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.27
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
4.25
Diana Wong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.23
Gina Adiutori
published 4.5
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Nada Pivcevic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Tracy Maurer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Dayna Webre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Jennifer Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Amy Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.94
Tammy Finlinson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.92
Chanel Chambers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.87
Chrissy Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.66
Susan Odonnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Adiutori + Jennifer Hansen4454% games+6.6% vs expected
Amy Gardner + Tammy Finlinson8658% games+3.1% vs expected
Nannette Staropoli + Dana Wagoner15360% games+1.4% vs expected
Dayna Webre + Nicki Sebold27662% games+1.4% vs expected
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi + Susan Odonnell4158% games+0.6% vs expected
Nicki Sebold + Dana Wagoner5457% games−2.6% vs expected
Dayna Webre + Tracy Maurer3444% games−5.8% vs expected
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi + Nicki Sebold6752% games−5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rodriguez
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Nannette Staropoli
98W–95L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Dana Wagoner
149W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Nicki Sebold
120W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi
14W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Diana Wong
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Gina Adiutori
197W–104L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Nada Pivcevic
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Tracy Maurer
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
Dayna Webre
148W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jennifer Hansen
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Amy Gardner
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Tammy Finlinson
61W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.94
4
Chanel Chambers
202W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Chrissy Rogers
23W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Susan Odonnell
13W–2L career · no lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.