Teams

NMAC.Lowrance

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 55 & Over · Summer Singles 55 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-06vs TOC.LiSplit 11
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Lijun Chen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Charmayne Rozenek4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-02vs TOC.LiLost 12
L#1 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Lijun Chen2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Charmayne Rozenek6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesSusan Newton vs Diane Volkmar4-6, 0-6
2026-07-30Lost 02
L#2 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Diane Volkmar1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Lusia Li1-6, 1-6
2026-07-16Split 11
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Diane Volkmar6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Lusia Li0-6, 3-6
2026-07-09vs TOC.LiLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusan Newton vs Lijun Chen1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Diane Volkmar0-6, 1-6
2026-06-25Lost 02
L#2 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Diane Volkmar0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesStacie White vs Lusia Li1-6, 3-6
2026-06-11Split 11
W#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Lusia Li6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Diane Volkmar6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Yvette LeGrande
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Stacie White
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Karen Johnston
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Susan Newton
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.19
Tracy Lowrance
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Holly Atkinson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Patty Parrnelli
published 3.5
Sandra Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Lowrance + Karen Johnston371061% games+3.5% vs expected
Patty Parrnelli + Holly Atkinson15655% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Yvette LeGrande
140W–139L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Stacie White
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Karen Johnston
259W–106L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Susan Newton
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Tracy Lowrance
185W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Holly Atkinson
252W–179L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Patty Parrnelli
159W–111L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sandra Jones
27W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.