Teams

BP - Helmly/Hollis

2026 SATA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 7.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-26vs BP - RischWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Hollis / Cecilia Koritschoner vs Rachel Lovett / Emily Somerville2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Monahan / Dede Laird vs Christie Risch / Stephanie Vietry6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBernadette Staudt / Maria de Kort vs Tobia Makover / Alicia Davis6-1, 6-3
2026-08-19vs Landings - Turner/MidwoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesPat Ventura / Deepa Kayyar vs Sharon Rowlett / Susan Souls6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBernadette Staudt / Sharon Zellerer vs Andrea Turner / Suzanne Doolan7-5, 6-0
2026-08-12vs BP - Olszewski/BrooksLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Johnson / Maria de Kort vs Sarah Pounders / Aimee Bellmore1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Hollis / Amber Spiegel vs Brienne Walsh / Christine Durrence6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Helmly / Deepa Kayyar vs Anne Brooks / Laura Beth King6-3, 6-3
2026-08-05vs BP - RischLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Tippins / Deepa Kayyar vs Rachel Lovett / Stephanie Vietry4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Monahan / Patricia Vierheilig vs Allison Konter / Gretchen Murphy6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBernadette Staudt / Dede Laird vs Katharine Manroe / Emily Somerville0-6, 6-7
2026-07-29vs Landings - Turner/MidwoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Tippins / Sharon Zellerer vs Liz Stockwell / Leigh Givens-Ulmer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan Hollis / Christine Shields vs Suzanne Doolan / Christine Midwood6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracy Burks / Dede Laird vs Janet Whitley / Dawn Sabin6-3, 6-0
2026-07-22vs BP - Olszewski/BrooksLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Helmly / Carrie Coggins vs Catharine Thomas / Sarah Pounders4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Shields / Bernadette Staudt vs Anna Berwitz / Brienne Walsh3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Jowers / Allisen Rogers vs Christine Durrence / Beth Benson4-6, 2-6
2026-07-15vs BP - RischWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Coggins / Mary Tippins vs Katharine Manroe / Clara Fishel6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPat Ventura / Patricia Vierheilig vs Rachel Lovett / Leza Stein2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Helmly / Maria de Kort vs Christie Risch / Rachel Ober6-4, 6-3
2026-07-08vs Landings - Turner/MidwoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesPat Ventura / Emma Queen vs Liz Stockwell / Christina Mondy6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracy Burks / Amber Spiegel vs Janet Caswell / Andrea Turner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs BP - Olszewski/BrooksLost 12
L#1 DoublesAsha Richards-Davis / Sharon Zellerer vs Sarah Pounders / Catharine Thomas3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Hollis / Dede Laird vs Brienne Walsh / Anna Berwitz2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Helmly / Maria de Kort vs Polly Duck / Megan Stern6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BP - Olszewski/Brooks6116513161
2BP - Risch4314718178
3BP - Helmly/Hollis34101123177
4Landings - Turner/Midwood1621939240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Mary Tippins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.91
Asha Richards-Davis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Pat Ventura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Michelle Monahan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.83
Katie Helmly
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Tracy Burks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Bernadette Staudt
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.75
Megan Hollis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.71
Helen Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Emily Jowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Deepa Kayyar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.67
Kelly Pendarvis
published
3.61
Maria de Kort
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Carrie Coggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Sharon Zellerer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Cecilia Koritschoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Patricia Vierheilig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Emma Queen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Dede Laird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Allisen Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christine Shields
published 3.5
3.20
Amber Spiegel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Ventura + Megan Hollis8851% games+8.6% vs expected
Mary Tippins + Michelle Monahan3357% games+3.4% vs expected
Katie Helmly + Asha Richards-Davis3253% games+1.6% vs expected
Allisen Rogers + Patricia Vierheilig10261% games−0.0% vs expected
Bernadette Staudt + Tracy Burks4253% gamesnot enough data
Bernadette Staudt + Katie Helmly224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Burks + Asha Richards-Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Tippins + Katie Helmly134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Tippins
58W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Asha Richards-Davis
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
Pat Ventura
47W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Michelle Monahan
93W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
Katie Helmly
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.83
Tracy Burks
24W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Bernadette Staudt
31W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Megan Hollis
49W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Helen Johnson
44W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Emily Jowers
45W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Deepa Kayyar
53W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.67
Kelly Pendarvis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Maria de Kort
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carrie Coggins
45W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Sharon Zellerer
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Cecilia Koritschoner
32W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.57
Patricia Vierheilig
28W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Emma Queen
19W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Dede Laird
27W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Allisen Rogers
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Christine Shields
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Amber Spiegel
44W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.