Teams

Cl.Duff18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-13vs Sa.Fitzpatrick18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Sara Fitzpatrick6-1, 6-1
2024-04-22vs Au.Beam18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesBailey Anthony vs Kalli Unthank7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs La.Hampton18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesBailey Anthony / Seely Nicholson vs Jennifer Bent / Kristin Upchurch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-08vs Br.Robinson18A2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesFerebee Plyler / Caroline Smith vs Brittany Robinson / Alexa Spain6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSeely Nicholson / Kaitlyn Floyd vs Melissa Thomas / Marilyn Gordian5-7, 1-6
2024-04-02vs De.MacCormac18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesBailey Anthony / Kelly Jones vs Spencer Busby / Liz Bottoms6-3, 6-3
2024-03-11vs Am.Potratz18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Ellen Shook6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ferebee Plyler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Claire Capps
published 3.5
3.05
Margaret Eller
published
2.97
Claire Duff
published 3
2.81
Seely Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Charlotte Mercer
published 3
2.55
Bailey Anthony
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.51
CarolAnn Wiggs
published 2.5
2.42
Kaitlyn Floyd
published
Myers Avram
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ferebee Plyler + Claire Capps11368% games+12.4% vs expected
Bailey Anthony + Seely Nicholson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ferebee Plyler
87W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Claire Capps
47W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Margaret Eller
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Claire Duff
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Seely Nicholson
25W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Charlotte Mercer
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Bailey Anthony
20W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
CarolAnn Wiggs
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
Margaret Ann Kleisch
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kaitlyn Floyd
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Myers Avram
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.