Teams

KWCC - Goldfish

2023 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Kelly Krenzke
published
Candace Love
published 3.5
3.16
MaJoy Gustilo
published
3.15
Cari Greenley
published 3.5
3.14
Brandee Johnsen
published 3.5
3.04
Lisbeth Andrews
published
3.01
Tricia Tinnin
published
2.98
Sandra Swift
published
2.92
Bobbie Glasscock
published 3
2.89
Denise Dunham
published 3.5
2.82
Amanda Medler
published 3
2.69
Gretchen Collier
published 3
Kim Dushinske
published
Kim Land
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Greenley + Kelly Krenzke111047% games−5.1% vs expected
Brandee Johnsen + Anne-Marie Kapoor134 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Tinnin + Cari Greenley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Krenzke
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Candace Love
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
MaJoy Gustilo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cari Greenley
23W–27L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Brandee Johnsen
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
Lisbeth Andrews
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Tricia Tinnin
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Sandra Swift
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Bobbie Glasscock
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
3.5
Denise Dunham
4W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Anne-Marie Kapoor
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Amanda Medler
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gretchen Collier
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Kim Dushinske
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Land
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.