Teams

SD LLWC 7.0 SDTRC/ Channick

2021 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Summer - SD · SD - 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-29vs SD LLW 7.0 Barnes TC / WestLost 01
L#2 DoublesJon Schimmer / Alisa Le vs Jeffrey Gillie / Denysse Castaneda6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-14vs SD 7.0 Mtn View/ RozoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlisa Le / Jon Schimmer vs Viviana Rozo / Anthony Reyes6-4, 6-4
2021-07-31vs SD 7.0 Mtn View Hold 'Em/ CrawfordLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobin Maher / Jon Schimmer vs Becky Yzaguirre / Cesar Cahue2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-26vs SD 7.0 ECCTA/ HernandezWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlisa Le / Jon Schimmer vs Deltrina Raymond / Tony Almanza6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-19vs SD 7.0 Mtn View Hold 'Em/ CrawfordLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlisa Le / Jon Schimmer vs Katerina Govoni / Jeffrey Bertolini3-6, 1-6
2021-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlisa Le / Jon Schimmer vs Susan Jeremiah / Reginald Blue6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Marc Channick
published 4
3.92
Sandy Dielman
published 4
3.89
Kerry Ott
published
3.65
Jon Schimmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Robin Maher
published 4
3.52
Colin Chang
published 4
3.48
Mary Garvey
published
3.48
Michael Faltico
published 3.5
3.42
Jeff Greenwald
published
Alisa Le
published 3.5
2.93
Diane Greenwood
published 3.5
William Witt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Faltico + Robin Maher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marc Channick
202W–81L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Sandy Dielman
165W–103L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kerry Ott
14W–21L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Jon Schimmer
37W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Robin Maher
35W–58L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Colin Chang
1W–11L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
Mary Garvey
21W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Michael Faltico
46W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jeff Greenwald
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Alisa Le
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Diane Greenwood
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
William Witt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.