Teams

GAC BLUE

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

16 players · average NTRP 3.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-05vs RRTC BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichael Kark / Keren Ritchie vs Helena Huckabee / Brett Nickerson3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Patton / Susan Kleimann vs Ying Li / Bowen Banbury4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-28vs CPV BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Walsh / Michael Patton vs Stephanie Lanziner / Stefan Lanziner6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Putnam / Brian Mervak vs Andrea Smart / Jeffrey Burton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Mervak / Clifford Simms vs Kimberly Young / Timothy Linsenmeyer2-6, 1-6
2026-06-21vs Colorado/Kisch/MX40&Over6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Mervak / Leah Putnam vs Michael Swan / Kelli Swan4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSterling Field / Sarah Mervak vs Stephanie Smith / Jeff Smith0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJason Wagner / Merly Utsler vs Eric DuPaul / Shannon Fronapfel6-3, 6-3
2026-06-14vs HRCA-S GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Younggren / Jason Wagner vs Kara Edmiston Lavaux / Andy Stephan6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBret Hansen / Leah Putnam vs Janelle Banat / Rj Banat0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRussell Stewart / Susan Kleimann vs Shon Payne / Jenna Sellers3-6, 4-6
2026-05-31vs EM REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Patton / Susan Wist vs Mauricio Mejia / Cynthia Mejia6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Wagner / Amy Walsh vs Andy Kay / Anne Kay6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBret Hansen / Sarah Younggren vs Ryan Matley / Mika Gans4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-24vs CCV REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Walsh / Michael Patton vs Ben Hick / Michelle McDonald6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBret Hansen - * / Sarah Mervak vs Gavin McCarty / Kristin Mccarty1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRussell Stewart / Leah Putnam vs Hillary Biskner / Timothy Fete7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Russell Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Bret Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Brian Mervak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Michael Patton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Jason Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Amy Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Clifford Simms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Merly Utsler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Sarah Younggren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Sarah Mervak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Susan Wist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Leah Putnam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.06
Susan Kleimann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Keren Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Kark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sterling Field
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Mervak + Sarah Mervak63037% games−2.7% vs expected
Leah Putnam + Sterling Field314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Wist + Michael Patton213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Younggren + Bret Hansen123 matchesnot enough data
Merly Utsler + Bret Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russell Stewart
115W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Bret Hansen
12W–16L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Brian Mervak
58W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Michael Patton
70W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
Jason Wagner
70W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Amy Walsh
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Clifford Simms
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Merly Utsler
45W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Sarah Younggren
34W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Sarah Mervak
58W–115L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Susan Wist
23W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Leah Putnam
49W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Susan Kleimann
36W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Keren Ritchie
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Kark
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sterling Field
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.