Teams

Wasatch Hills-Flower Power

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W PM

18 players · average NTRP 4.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-29vs Liberty Park-Wallace/KempLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Walzer / Rachel Lamont vs Christine Fotheringham / Nanette Heath4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTressa Gilbert vs Morgan Behymer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlexandria Keith / Teri Bishop vs Kristi Roggensack / Katie Zimmerman2-6, 4-6
2025-05-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMalika Maxwell / Zaylie Collins vs Brook Vietor / Heidi Gordon4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Lamont vs Whitney Fautin3-6, 3-6
2025-05-15Split 11
L#1 SinglesTressa Gilbert vs Cyndi Jones3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShanda Stoner / Alexandria Keith vs Britney Klaetsch / Cathy Davis6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesAvery Bowman / Stephanie Walzer vs Debra Rawlings / Libble Ginster1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTressa Gilbert vs Diana Cole5-7, 4-6
2025-05-01vs Liberty Park-Bernard/SterbenzLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Keith / Cherstin Harris vs Ashley Miyazaki / Stacie Johnson2-6, 6-7
2025-04-24vs Liberty Park-Wallace/KempLost 03
L#1 DoublesHayley Pratt / Cherstin Harris vs Lora Cobabe / Taylor Cordovil4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIvana Grbelja vs Morgan Behymer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShanda Stoner / Alexandria Keith vs Carlene Kemp / Kathy Miller-Rees3-6, 5-7
2025-04-17Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHayley Pratt / Cherstin Harris vs Brook Vietor / Stephanie Tonin6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZaylie Collins / Malika Maxwell vs Heather Foy / JaNae Smith2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAlexandria Keith vs Whitney Fautin2-6, 2-6
2025-04-10Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Keith / Stephanie Walzer vs Karina Herman / Amy Woolley6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMalika Maxwell vs Victoria Lara6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesIvana Grbelja / Rachel Lamont vs Cathy Davis / Jen Dickey6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park-Bernard/Sterbenz71301029298
2Sports Mall-Marz/Duran53202043360
3Wasatch Hills-Flower Power0863473468

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Stephanie Walzer
usually #1 Singles 65%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Avery Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christina Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.02
Cherstin Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Ellie Flowers
published 4.5
4.01
Ivana Grbelja
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Zaylie Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Rachel Lamont
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Tressa Gilbert
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Shanda Stoner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.76
Alexandria Keith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.74
Kim Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.65
Teri Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4
3.58
Elma Tatarevic
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Michelle Moscon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
Hayley Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
LIZ CARLSON
published
Malika Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Mooney + LIZ CARLSON323050% games−1.9% vs expected
Christina Mooney + Shanda Stoner123 matchesnot enough data
Kim Cronin + Teri Bishop123 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Lamont + Stephanie Walzer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephanie Walzer
82W–43L career · 20 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Avery Bowman
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christina Mooney
56W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cherstin Harris
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Ellie Flowers
29W–30L career · type S · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Ivana Grbelja
5W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Zaylie Collins
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
4.5
Rachel Lamont
44W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
Tressa Gilbert
12W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Shanda Stoner
39W–100L career · 7 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.77
4.5
Alexandria Keith
46W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
Kim Cronin
380W–237L career · 22 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Teri Bishop
181W–151L career · 17 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Elma Tatarevic
128W–82L career · 10 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Michelle Moscon
90W–145L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Hayley Pratt
48W–37L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
LIZ CARLSON
41W–45L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Malika Maxwell
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.