Teams

X55 7.0 MV Gustafson

2023 NEOTA Mixed 55 & Over Fall · NEOTA 7.0 55&O Mixed Fall

21 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.0 55&O Mixed Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Ken Gustafson
published
3.51
Frank Mercuri
published 3.5
3.51
Pamela Zalba
published
3.33
Cyrus Bazljoo
published 3.5
3.32
Mark Atkinson
published
3.32
Mary Wilburn
published
3.31
Bob Berichon
published 3.5
3.30
Patricia Mercuri
published
3.25
Lynn Sands
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Wei Liao
published
3.17
Sangyoon Lee
published
3.13
Chuck Roman
published 3
2.99
Karen McLeod
published
2.93
Elyse Gustafson
published 3.5
2.67
Audrey Heckaman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Anna Kondratova
published 3
Charles Wellman
published
Jerry Adell
published
Richard Kozich
published
Richard Rozell
published
Stuart Meyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Gustafson + Ken Gustafson121350% games+0.5% vs expected
Frank Mercuri + Patricia Mercuri7162% games−1.3% vs expected
Audrey Heckaman + Wei Liao3645% games−8.1% vs expected
Chuck Roman + Patricia Mercuri5257% gamesnot enough data
Karen McLeod + Ken Gustafson4357% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Zalba + Charles Wellman4356% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Zalba + Mark Atkinson3453% gamesnot enough data
Elyse Gustafson + Cyrus Bazljoo2447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Gustafson
139W–98L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Frank Mercuri
109W–135L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pamela Zalba
149W–136L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cyrus Bazljoo
67W–61L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Mark Atkinson
75W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Mary Wilburn
64W–62L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Bob Berichon
85W–56L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Patricia Mercuri
171W–118L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Lynn Sands
51W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Wei Liao
67W–74L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Sangyoon Lee
49W–42L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Chuck Roman
96W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.13
Karen McLeod
54W–85L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Elyse Gustafson
103W–128L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Audrey Heckaman
73W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Anna Kondratova
29W–45L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
Charles Wellman
53W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerry Adell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Kozich
38W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Rozell
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stuart Meyer
27W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.