Teams

OC LPC Lob-sters - Brandon Sun1pm

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-06vs OC RCI - Mike - Sat1pmLost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Keolasy / Rachel Om vs Bradley Fisher / Thanh Lopez5-7, 1-6
2023-04-05vs OC - LPC - Bennett Sat3Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Namie / York Cheng vs Luciano Rodriguez / Jinna Johnson2-6, 4-6
2023-04-01vs OC NBTC - Scott Sat11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesYork Cheng / Sally Namie vs Ron Schoenbaum / Kristen Bendanna5-7, 4-6
2023-03-26vs OC LPC - Emily Sun1pmWon 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Keolasy / Rachel Om vs Blair Brzeski / Victor Wu6-3, 6-4
2023-02-26vs OC LPC - Emily Sun1pmSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJustin Yee / Margaret Wang vs Aki Eguchi / Dave Kang6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristen Hoppe / York Cheng vs TRAM LY / Victor Wu7-5, 7-5
2023-02-19vs OC LLW iTennis LaHabra- LeonardLost 01
L#3 DoublesRachel Om / Daniel Keolasy vs Tyrone Wang / Jenny Tsai6-7, 1-6
2023-02-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesYork Cheng / Sally Namie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-12vs OC NBTC - Scott Sat11Won 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Wang / Justin Yee vs Scott Tiernan / Stacey Kwasizur6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Keolasy / Rachel Om vs Gino Aielli / Krysia Leason2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-05vs OC LLW iTennis LaHabra- LeonardWon 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Yee / Margaret Wang vs Tyrone Wang / Jenny Tsai3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Daniel Keolasy
published 5
4.47
Justin Yee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.43
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.30
York Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
Andre Law
published 4.5
3.98
Rachel Om
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Sally Namie
published
3.77
Bill Yim
published 4
Margaret Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Keolasy + Rachel Om13174% games+21.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Keolasy
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.71
Justin Yee
100W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
4.47
Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
York Cheng
63W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Andre Law
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Rachel Om
164W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.98
Sally Namie
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.80
4
Bill Yim
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Margaret Wang
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.