← Teams

THPRD-Ng

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Debbie Spitzer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Jing Feng
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Mihee Park
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.14
Jane Shu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Janice Kuo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Christina Bergstrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Rosalie Trevejo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results9 ties
2020-03-08Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesJane Shu / Christina Bergstrom vs Michelle Zawadzki / Kelsey McGinnis7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesManisha Thakkar / Rosalie Trevejo vs Irene Gilbertson / Anita Palodichuk6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJing Feng vs Leslie Cole6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMihee Park / Laura Rich vs Kristin DeVoto / Karen Lettiere6-2, 6-1
2020-03-01Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Fei / Debbie Spitzer vs Ruth Semon / Sharon Patricelli6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Wanda Ng vs Cricket Forsey / Lisa McBee6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJing Feng vs Lucila Griesser6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Janice Kuo vs Dana Hennelly / Rhonda Baker3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2020-02-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDebbie Spitzer / Jennifer Fei vs Julia Henry / Karin Owens6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJane Shu / Rosalie Trevejo vs Nicola Ash / Carol Glenn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Kuo / Wanda Ng vs Michelle Ellett / Sonya Wilson6-1, 6-3
2020-01-25Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDebbie Spitzer / Jennifer Fei vs Michele Kreager / Victoria Chamberlain6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesManisha Thakkar / Mihee Park vs Jing Li / Lupine Swanson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJing Feng vs Naun Yvonne Kim6-1, 6-2
2020-01-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Wanda Ng vs Jennifer Drew / Nicole Vedder7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Mihee Park vs Marianne Conroy / Sanae Ito7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJing Feng vs Betty Roux6-4, 6-3
2020-01-12Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesWanda Ng / Mihee Park vs Teresa Darling / Trish Carder6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Janice Kuo vs Molly Wilson / Mary Jane Toolson6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJing Feng vs Robin Burak6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRosalie Trevejo / Jane Shu vs ADINA KELLEY / Virginia Martinez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2020-01-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDebbie Spitzer / Jennifer Fei vs Judy Friedman / Karen Ostrye6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJing Feng / Wanda Ng vs Jennifer Steward / Ilona Vondolovski3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesManisha Thakkar / Mihee Park vs Cindy Rowe / Barbara Lolich6-1, 6-2
2019-12-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJing Feng / Justin Shull vs Alex Harbell / Michele Waite6-2, 6-2
2019-12-13Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesNorman Langston / Jane Shu vs Shawn Boyce / Jill Boyce6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Debbie Spitzer
145W–63L career
0%74%26%
3.53
3.5
Jing Feng
113W–80L career
1%99%0%
3.25
3
Mihee Park
147W–89L career
0%23%77%
3.20
3.5
Jane Shu
79W–33L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3
Janice Kuo
59W–28L career
0%84%16%
2.98
3
Christina Bergstrom
67W–50L career
0%76%24%
2.97
3
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
119W–97L career
0%96%4%
2.89
2.5
Rosalie Trevejo
28W–41L career
0%48%52%
2.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.