← Search

Christina Bergstrom

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 67W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Bergstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2025-11-02 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Harnden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-18 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Harnden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-27 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Harnden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-03 · VTC-Won/Watkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Won mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-26 · VTC-Won/Watkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Won mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-02 · Jacobsen-High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Caroline Davidson / CHRISTINE McNair
2025-06-14 · Jacobsen-High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-05-18 · CRRC-Ash/Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-05-10 · CRRC-Ash/Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-05-03 · CRRC-Ash/Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-16 · CRRC-Ash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicola Ash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.9% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.7% of games
6.0mixed
76%
19W–6L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
48.9%
23W–24L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe