Teams

LCTA40/Fox/LTPDI

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Men - 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-08vs LCTA40/Keiper/CTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Johnson / Stephen Mueller vs Robert Driggers / Matthew Whipple1-6, 2-6
2022-08-18vs LCTA40/Tizzard/ParkWestLost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Etheridge / Brian Johnson vs Ryan Zimmerman / Terrence Tizzard1-6, 6-7
2022-07-28vs LCTA40/Cooke/MPRLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Johnson / MacIej Dziurgot vs Kevin Shuler / Ken Ruggiero3-6, 4-6
2022-07-21vs LCTA40/Hatmaker/LegendOaksWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / MacIej Dziurgot vs Thomas Floyd / Patrick Stuart6-1, 6-0
2022-07-07vs LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWestLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Johnson / MacIej Dziurgot vs Doug Gerard / James Miller5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-30vs LCTA40/Spears/DotyParkWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Stephen Mueller vs Kevin Nowak / Matthew Hirsch6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Men - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
MacIej Dziurgot
published
3.33
Anthony Dedoes
published 3.5
3.27
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Mueller
published
3.17
Steve Fennell
published
3.00
Bruce Etheridge
published 3
2.88
Lee Larrew
published
Dee Ring
published 3
2.69
Robert Brame
published
Jim Payne
published
Roderick Buckley
published
Rusty Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MacIej Dziurgot + Steve Fennell15164% games+7.2% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Steve Fennell5457% games+6.8% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Bruce Etheridge3354% games+4.9% vs expected
Lee Larrew + Robert Brame6357% games+3.8% vs expected
Stephen Mueller + Bruce Etheridge7456% games+3.4% vs expected
Stephen Mueller + Steve Fennell7556% games+1.4% vs expected
Lee Larrew + Stephen Mueller8258% games+0.7% vs expected
Anthony Dedoes + Steve Fennell7155% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MacIej Dziurgot
118W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Anthony Dedoes
41W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Brian Johnson
128W–179L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Stephen Mueller
59W–41L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Steve Fennell
96W–53L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Bruce Etheridge
89W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lee Larrew
45W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Dee Ring
19W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Brame
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Jim Payne
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roderick Buckley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rusty Fox
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.