Teams

YMCA Green

2026 OH OV Mixed 18&O Charleston · 2026 MXD 18&O 8.0 Charleston

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-12vs Teays Valley PrinceLost 02
L#1 DoublesTanner Whipkey / Kristin Warner vs Carol Porter / Brian McCutcheon6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJJ Casto / Caroline Green vs Maddy Pratt / Matthew Sutton3-6, 6-7
2026-06-28vs Teays Valley PrinceLost 12
L#1 DoublesJJ Casto / Allison Ballard vs Isaiah Blake / Sydney Prince4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Green / Tanner Whipkey vs Brian McCutcheon / Maddy Pratt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNoah Fulks / Mary Cook vs Matthew Sutton / Juliana Tankersley6-3, 6-3
2026-06-13vs Teays Valley PrinceLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelby King / Tanner Whipkey vs Melinda White / Joshua Lawson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJJ Casto / Kristin Warner vs Sydney Prince / Isaiah Blake3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 MXD 18&O 8.0 Charleston
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Teays Valley Prince2051554
2YMCA Green02151060

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Noah Fulks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Caroline Green
published 4
3.73
Kristin Warner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
JJ Casto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Tanner Whipkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Allison Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Shelby King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelby King + Tanner Whipkey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noah Fulks
26W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.00
4
Caroline Green
28W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristin Warner
35W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.73
JJ Casto
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
Tanner Whipkey
46W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
4
Allison Ballard
43W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Shelby King
30W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.