Teams

San Jose - Hedrick

2023 Duval Trilevel Women · 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Brannon / Jen Frenzel vs Teresa Mcallister / Alison Garcia7-5, 7-6
2023-06-29vs The Plantation - NewbyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJen Frenzel / Kerry Phillips vs Amy Balsimo / Renee Callahan6-3, 6-1
2023-06-15vs Deerwood - DeNapoliLost 01
L#1 DoublesJen Frenzel / Kerry Phillips vs Deborah Caven / Sarah Kambach1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
3.53
Natasha Eliz
published
3.50
Julie Boone
published
3.47
Jen Frenzel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Jessica Hedrick
published
3.46
Karin Selfors
published
3.46
Nancy Hennessy
published
3.40
Kylie Oneal
published
3.20
Janet Olinto
published
3.19
BETSEY WINSLOW
published 3.5
3.19
Ambur Finley
published 3.5
3.19
Kathryn Dickey
published
3.18
Karla Liguori
published
3.17
Allison Wise
published 3.5
3.12
Emily Dostie
published 3.5
2.88
Diane Martin
published 3
2.81
Phyllis Crabtree
published
Melissa Brannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Olinto + Allison Wise224 matchesnot enough data
Allison Wise + Nancy Hennessy224 matchesnot enough data
BETSEY WINSLOW + Kathryn Dickey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Tiedeberg
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Natasha Eliz
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
Julie Boone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.50
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jessica Hedrick
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
Karin Selfors
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Nancy Hennessy
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kylie Oneal
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Allison Korman Shelton
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Olinto
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
BETSEY WINSLOW
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ambur Finley
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Kathryn Dickey
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Karla Liguori
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Allison Wise
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Dostie
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Diane Martin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.88
Phyllis Crabtree
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Dixie McDaniel de Andrade
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.70
Melissa Brannon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.