Teams

The Plantation - Newby

2023 Duval Trilevel Women · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-17vs Queen's Harbour - BrinkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmber Moorman / Renee Callahan vs Janice Brinker / Teresa Mcallister5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Amber Moorman vs Meredith Frisch / Victoria Miller4-6, 0-6
2023-07-27vs Jax Beach Tennis Center - ToomeyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Amber Moorman vs Karen Miller / Erika Hermetz7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Amber Moorman vs Elizabeth Paul / Monica Moore6-4, 7-6
2023-06-29vs San Jose - HedrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Renee Callahan vs Jen Frenzel / Kerry Phillips3-6, 1-6
2023-06-15vs Sawgrass - WrightWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Amber Moorman vs Sherill Herzfeld / Mary Coban6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amber Moorman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Amy Balsimo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.11
Renee Callahan
published
3.02
2.87
Marissa Alex
published
2.84
Heather Newby
published 3
2.78
Colleen Licata
published 3
Ashley Baldwin
published 3
2.73
Sheila Pensotti
published
Jane Freedman
published
Kathleen Sullivan
published
Louise Jack
published
Rachael Mayer
published
Tara McMillen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Moorman + Amy Balsimo7648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amber Moorman
10W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amy Balsimo
28W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Renee Callahan
2W–20L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Deanna Leschinski
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Marissa Alex
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Heather Newby
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Colleen Licata
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ashley Baldwin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheila Pensotti
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jane Freedman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Sullivan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Louise Jack
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Mayer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara McMillen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.