Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Navarro

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-14vs Pelican Landing - MooneySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Coates vs Cynthia Emhardt / Catherine Ross7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Karey Hogan vs Carol Polipnick / Catherine Prosia0-6, 3-6
2022-02-28vs Cambier - L. GustSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Wright / Lori Caple vs Carol White / Sheila MacNicol3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Coates vs Patricia Wille / Lisa Gust6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-21vs Pelican Marsh - PrenticeLost 02
L#2 DoublesKarey Hogan / Susanne Navarro vs Linda Michaux / Leigh Traut4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Jo Anna Cline vs Fiona Prentice / Kimberly Taylor6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-14vs Treviso bay - B.WoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Coates vs Lucy Martin / Gail Moore7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Karey Hogan vs Angela Grant / Michele Bongiorno6-2, 6-1
2022-02-07vs Players Club - J. WautersWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Coates vs Jill Kerxton / Susan Burgess7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngela Whinyates / Lori Caple vs Sheila Smith / Sherry Cummings6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Karey Hogan vs Mary Gorte / Loyce Snyder2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-31vs Grey Hawk - J. HulbertWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Caple / Angela Whinyates vs Donna Curry / Beth Rainey6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Jo Anna Cline vs Dianne Black / Deborah Vinci4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-01-24vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Coates vs Maria Blakslee / Jennifer Sherman3-6, 2-4
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Karey Hogan vs Marianne Khayat / Mary Mastrogiacomo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Whinyates / Lori Caple vs Patrice Clapacs / Ramsay Erickson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-17vs Heritage Bay - L. KeillorWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Forner / Karey Hogan vs Gina Garfunkel / Catherine Barsky6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Brenda Bensmiller vs Lauren Keillor / Diana Pleeter6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Lori Coates vs Jacqui ONeal Privitere / Anne Mortillaro6-4, 6-3
2022-01-10vs Pelican Bay North - L. AllenLost 02
L#2 DoublesLori Coates / Angela Springer vs Peggy Strakosch / Minok Allen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / Lori Caple vs Lisbeth Wilson / Christina Zajac4-6, 6-7
2022-01-03vs Esplanade- SteuererSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Brenda Bensmiller vs Carol Halliday / Michele Colgate6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Lori Coates vs Tina Albright / Katherine MacWilliams6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Karey Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.66
Angela Springer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Lori Caple
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Angela Whinyates
published 3.5
3.36
Susanne Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Brenda Bensmiller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Angela Aline
published 3.5
Janice Forner
published
Jo Anna Cline
published
Lori Coates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Mary Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Springer + Susanne Navarro5454% games+1.7% vs expected
Angela Springer + Lori Coates543854% games−1.2% vs expected
Angela Springer + Lori Caple2846% games−10.8% vs expected
Lori Coates + Susanne Navarro13851% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Susanne Navarro8946% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Bensmiller + Karey Hogan7551% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Lori Caple6452% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karey Hogan
91W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Angela Springer
88W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Angela Whinyates
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Brenda Bensmiller
64W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Angela Aline
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Janice Forner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jo Anna Cline
25W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Wright
25W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.