Teams

HMTC RED

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-27vs HMTC GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesCindy Lewis / Doug Ruffin vs Neal McConnellogue / Kimberly Tomlinson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Badger / Nancy Williams vs Kim McConnellogue / RJ Westlind7-5, 6-2
2021-06-20vs LVTAWon 20
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Michael Jamieson vs Sonda Huhta / Jared Petersen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Lewis / Doug Ruffin vs Dennis Flanigan / Paige Woodard6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-19vs MLFWon 21
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Michael Jamieson vs Annette Vizena / James Nuttall7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Lewis / Doug Ruffin vs Trudy Samuelson / Chet Reistad7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelley Hoime / Stu Hoime vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Nicholas Roe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-06vs HMTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Michael Jamieson vs Kendal Sanders / Kimberly Tomlinson6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKelley Hoime / Stu Hoime vs Shane Westlind / Michelle Sowitch4-6, 3-6
2021-06-05vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Draper / Michael Jamieson vs Sonda Huhta / Adam Less3-6, 2-6
2021-05-23vs MLFSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCindy Lewis / Doug Ruffin vs Trudy Samuelson / James Nuttall6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKelley Hoime / Stu Hoime vs Dean Cunningham / Susan Starr Nelson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Doug Ruffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Gail Draper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Matt Badger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kelley Hoime
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Stu Hoime
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Arte Libunao
published 3.5
Michael Jamieson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Draper + Matt Badger8559% games−3.9% vs expected
Kelley Hoime + Stu Hoime51241% games−6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Doug Ruffin
61W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Gail Draper
154W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.10
4
Matt Badger
55W–33L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Kelley Hoime
46W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Stu Hoime
42W–66L career · 3 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Arte Libunao
12W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Jamieson
14W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mischel Ebon Libunao
16W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.