Teams

HMTC GREEN

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-27vs HMTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Nyland / Rebecca Tatman vs Mischel Ebon Libunao / Arte Libunao5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNeal McConnellogue / Kimberly Tomlinson vs Cindy Lewis / Doug Ruffin2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKim McConnellogue / RJ Westlind vs Matt Badger / Nancy Williams5-7, 2-6
2021-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Nyland / Rebecca Tatman vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Nicholas Roe4-6, 0-6
2021-06-13vs LVTALost 02
L#1 DoublesErika Preuss / Neal McConnellogue vs Sonda Huhta / Jared Petersen5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim McConnellogue / Kendal Sanders vs Paige Woodard / Dennis Flanigan1-6, 2-6
2021-05-23vs LVTASplit 11
W#1 DoublesErika Preuss / Neal McConnellogue vs Bonita Hanner / Brian Smith6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim McConnellogue / RJ Westlind vs Valerie Hecker / Adam Less2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erika Preuss
published 4.5
3.94
Kimberly Tomlinson
published
Bryce Sowitch
published 4
3.65
Rebecca Tatman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Kendal Sanders
published
3.32
Neal McConnellogue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim McConnellogue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Holly K. Brown
published 3.5
Jeff Nyland
published
RJ Westlind
published
Shane Westlind
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McConnellogue + Neal McConnellogue2642% games−11.9% vs expected
Kendal Sanders + Rebecca Tatman0529% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Tomlinson + Jeff Nyland2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erika Preuss
9W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Tomlinson
40W–38L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Bryce Sowitch
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Rebecca Tatman
47W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kendal Sanders
57W–84L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Neal McConnellogue
62W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Kim McConnellogue
36W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Holly K. Brown
24W–51L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jeff Nyland
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
RJ Westlind
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shane Westlind
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.