Teams

GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Serene Lai
published
3.77
Janet Lautenberger
published
3.75
Jennifer Westly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Adrienne Ladd
published 4
3.74
Tamara York
published
3.72
Elaine Ikeda
published
3.62
Christina Tse
published 4
3.57
Allison Don
published 4
3.53
Maria Vegas
published
3.53
Betty Lee
published 4
3.53
Tammy Mason
published
3.48
Wanda Soon
published
3.47
Ria Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Martha Ehrenfeld
published
3.25
Amy Jang
published 3.5
3.19
Janet Arnesty
published
3.06
Lisa Shaw
published
Heidi Lorne
published
Janis Porto
published
Nancy Wong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Ikeda + Allison Don134 matchesnot enough data
Maria Vegas + Serene Lai224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Serene Lai
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Janet Lautenberger
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Jennifer Westly
27W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Adrienne Ladd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tamara York
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Elaine Ikeda
17W–25L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Christina Tse
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
4
Allison Don
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Maria Vegas
27W–36L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Betty Lee
18W–26L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Tammy Mason
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Wanda Soon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Martha Ehrenfeld
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Amy Jang
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Janet Arnesty
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Lisa Shaw
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.06
Heidi Lorne
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janis Porto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Wong
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.