Teams

Seniorita

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.31 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-07vs AnneLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Panayota Semons-Short vs Kathy Dahlke / Amy Cunningham2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Kelly Wathne vs Karen Grasso / Lorie Murray6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesColleen Hansen / Cindy McRoberts vs Anne MacLachlan / Karen McGee1-6, 4-6
2022-05-03vs AnneLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Michele Surmelis vs Anne MacLachlan / Karen McGee0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Gibson / Colleen Hansen vs Alyce Brown / Venita Petti0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesShauna Myler / Panayota Semons-Short vs Lorie Murray / Wendy Workman4-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs AnneLost 12
W#1 DoublesTIna Fehringer / Patricia Bolinger vs Alyce Brown / Kathy Dahlke7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesColleen Hansen / Kelly Wathne vs Karen Grasso / Lorie Murray3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Shauna Myler vs Lurline Berry / Wendy Workman3-6, 6-7
2022-04-28vs AnneLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / TIna Fehringer vs Alyce Brown / Karen McGee6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShauna Myler / Colleen Hansen vs Venita Petti / Lisa Nelson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Teresa Henderson vs Lorie Murray / Karen Grasso6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-22vs AnneLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Gibson / Panayota Semons-Short vs Karen McGee / Lorie Murray1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTIna Fehringer / Shauna Myler vs Alyce Brown / Lisa Nelson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Michele Surmelis vs Lurline Berry / Wendy Workman1-6, 4-6
2022-04-18vs AnneWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Wathne / Michele Surmelis vs Amy Cunningham / Kathy Dahlke7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Patricia Bolinger vs Venita Petti / Lisa Nelson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Jane Gibson vs Anne MacLachlan / Karen McGee1-6, 2-6
2022-04-08vs AnneLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Patricia Bolinger vs Amy Cunningham / Lisa Nelson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTIna Fehringer / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Karen McGee / Alyce Brown1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Shauna Myler vs Lurline Berry / Wendy Workman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-02vs AnneLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeresa Henderson / TIna Fehringer vs Kathy Dahlke / Amy Cunningham6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Wathne / Panayota Semons-Short vs Alyce Brown / Anne MacLachlan4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Patricia Bolinger vs Venita Petti / Lisa Nelson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Anne7117717175
2Seniorita1771735244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Kelly Wathne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Cindy McRoberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Patricia Bolinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.07
Michele Surmelis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Shauna Myler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Panayota Semons-Short
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Colleen Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jane Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
TIna Fehringer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Bolinger + TIna Fehringer5154% games+4.9% vs expected
TIna Fehringer + Kelly Wathne6163% games+3.0% vs expected
Cindy McRoberts + Kelly Wathne4261% games+2.5% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Carrie Rose Lindley3940% games−0.9% vs expected
Panayota Semons-Short + Shauna Myler0630% games−1.2% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Panayota Semons-Short171449% games−2.0% vs expected
Patricia Bolinger + Carrie Rose Lindley4646% games−8.7% vs expected
Teresa Henderson + Carrie Rose Lindley3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Wathne
164W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cindy McRoberts
33W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Patricia Bolinger
33W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Michele Surmelis
240W–166L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
73W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Shauna Myler
104W–147L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Panayota Semons-Short
104W–117L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Colleen Hansen
46W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
Jane Gibson
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
TIna Fehringer
109W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.