Teams

ACB-Feldman

2023 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs TTC-TTC 4.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesSusan Massey / Elana Fedor vs Jane Brass Barth / Katie McGowan6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDawn Degrasse vs Sherresa Brasfield6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIrene Moore / Maricela Feldman vs Robin Evans / Claudia Hamilton6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Stephen / Margaret Collier vs Elizabeth Street / Emily Williams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-07vs S OR-ESTC-MohlerLost 04
L#1 DoublesGinger Alden / Elana Fedor vs Denise Wolfe / Tatiana Bakhtina3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Massey vs Jody Rolnick6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Uy / Cate McDonald vs Nami Brown / Tami Calkin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKim Himstreet / Margaret Collier vs Julie Mohler / Sue Devereux0-6, 4-6
2023-05-06vs S OR-ESTC-MohlerLost 13
L#1 DoublesElana Fedor / Irene Moore vs Tami Calkin / Victoria Gray2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Massey vs Darci Christian6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Uy / Maricela Feldman vs Denise Wolfe / Nami Brown2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCate McDonald / Margaret Collier vs Julie Mohler / Tatiana Bakhtina2-6, 2-6
2023-05-05vs TTC-TTC 4.0Won 31
L#1 DoublesGinger Alden / Susan Massey vs Jane Brass Barth / Katie McGowan3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDawn Degrasse vs Janet Lui-Hansen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIrene Moore / Maricela Feldman vs Robin Evans / Mayumi Trinidad7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Uy / Stacy Stephen vs Elizabeth Street / Emily Williams6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-ESTC-Mohler401428119
2ACB-Feldman2261020136
3TTC-TTC 4.00441227184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Maria Uy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Irene Moore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Elana Fedor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Susan Massey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.66
Cate McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Maricela Feldman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Dawn Degrasse
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Stacy Stephen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Margaret Collier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Kim Himstreet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ginger Alden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elana Fedor + Maricela Feldman4263% games+10.5% vs expected
Maria Uy + Susan Massey8653% games+0.8% vs expected
Elana Fedor + Susan Massey5159% games−1.7% vs expected
Maria Uy + Irene Moore2345% games−4.2% vs expected
Maria Uy + Stacy Stephen3252% games−5.2% vs expected
Dawn Degrasse + Stacy Stephen152044% games−5.7% vs expected
Elana Fedor + Ginger Alden3257% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Degrasse + Susan Massey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Uy
56W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Irene Moore
58W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Elana Fedor
89W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Susan Massey
45W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Cate McDonald
37W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Maricela Feldman
25W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Dawn Degrasse
88W–115L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Stacy Stephen
70W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Margaret Collier
28W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Kim Himstreet
75W–69L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Ginger Alden
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.