Teams

IE-TCC-Ellen Yarter

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-10vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Kathy Wilkinson vs Rebecca Cloyd / Diana Ortuno3-6, 2-6
2023-06-04vs IE-LLW-CL-Rhianna ThompsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Morgan / Trish Newlin vs Keiko Dodge / Lucy Vogliardo3-6, 6-7
2023-05-21vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Morgan / Trish Newlin vs Judy Henning / Janice Pascoe6-3, 6-1
2023-05-13vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Miller / Trish Newlin vs Casey Chau / Charanya Sivaraman1-6, 3-6
2023-05-06vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Morgan / Trish Newlin vs Susan Campbell-Boland / Elvia Quintana1-6, 5-7
2023-04-15vs IE-CCCC-Kathy CockerWon 10
W#3 DoublesTrish Newlin / Laurel Eriksen vs Theresa Winterburn / Marilyn Pellouchoud6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Shannon Sapp
published
3.80
Jami Johnson
published
3.61
Michelle Morgan
published
3.60
Trish Newlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.25
Ellen Yarter
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Shaheen Plunier
published
3.16
Kathy Wilkinson
published
3.11
Kerri Munson
usually #1 Singles 22%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.96
Jill Mastroluca
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Laurel Eriksen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Munson + Jill Mastroluca466546% games−2.4% vs expected
Kerri Munson + Ellen Yarter6454% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Yarter + Jill Mastroluca033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Sapp
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jami Johnson
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Michelle Morgan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Trish Newlin
55W–112L career · 6 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Shaheen Plunier
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Kathy Wilkinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Kerri Munson
129W–137L career · 8 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jill Mastroluca
87W–121L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.96
Laurel Eriksen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.