Teams

IE-MTC-Jeanne Shelter

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-25vs IE-LLW-CL-Rhianna ThompsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Judy Henning vs Keiko Dodge / Lucy Vogliardo7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-10vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Diana Ortuno vs Trish Newlin / Kathy Wilkinson6-3, 6-2
2023-05-28vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Diana Ortuno vs Susan Campbell-Boland / Jane Whitney0-6, 3-6
2023-05-13vs IE-LLW-CL-Rhianna ThompsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesRebecca Cloyd vs Dana Boyan5-7, 1-6
2023-04-16vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Ortuno / Rebecca Cloyd vs Lori Swingle / Susan Campbell-Boland6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Heather Toth
published
3.74
Rebecca Cloyd
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.70
Kim Wellman
published
3.64
Nicole Hollowell
published
3.63
Amanda Will
published 4
3.60
Judy Henning
published
3.55
Miranda Cass
published
3.48
Diana Ortuno
published 4
3.34
Jamie Warrington
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Elizabeth Bentley
published
3.22
Mary Ann Neder
published
3.19
Maureen Duncan
published
3.00
Tara Jones
published
2.97
Joan Greene
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Duncan + Elizabeth Bentley213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Cloyd + Nicole Hollowell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Toth
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Rebecca Cloyd
92W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Wellman
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Nicole Hollowell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Amanda Will
0W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Judy Henning
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
Miranda Cass
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Diana Ortuno
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Jamie Warrington
169W–118L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Elizabeth Bentley
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Ann Neder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.22
Maureen Duncan
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Tara Jones
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Joan Greene
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.