Teams

MONTE VISTA HS 40MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Harish Natarajan
published
3.94
Karlene Steelman
published
3.65
Priyank Saxena
published
3.62
Ritesh Bhandari
published
3.57
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.36
3.33
Jessica Vasisht
published
3.32
Rattana Graff
published
3.17
Brant Moore
published 3.5
3.15
Salvador Labrador
published
3.15
Guru Prasad Acharya
published
3.15
John Boral
published
3.07
2.98
Florita Labrador
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Patty Ly
published
2.93
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
2.89
Edward Graff
published
2.83
Phillip Johnson
published
Kathleen Olson
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Venkat Prodhuturi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harish Natarajan + Daljeet Singh2437% gamesnot enough data
Salvador Labrador + Florita Labrador134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Harish Natarajan
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
Karlene Steelman
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
Priyank Saxena
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Ritesh Bhandari
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Jessica Vasisht
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Brant Moore
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Salvador Labrador
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.15
Guru Prasad Acharya
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
John Boral
21W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Pathanjali Krishnasamy
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.07
Florita Labrador
70W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Patty Ly
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Edward Graff
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Phillip Johnson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Kathleen Olson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Venkat Prodhuturi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.