Teams

TOC.Day

2026 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over 5.0 Women Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-25vs TOC.TedamrongwanishLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeatrice Faureng / Emily Perry vs Jennifer McEntee / Heidi Steiber2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Speicher vs Elizabeth Hodges4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulia Howard / Anastasiya Manet vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish / Paula Collado Cordon0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-18vs TOC.TedamrongwanishLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulia Howard / Nena Marks vs MacY Fisher / Heidi Steiber2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Reese / Elizabeth Speicher vs Paula Collado Cordon / Heather Remley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-11vs TOC.TedamrongwanishWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadeline Brown / Elizabeth Speicher vs Laura Alvarez / Kelly Moler Glass6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDanielle Wilder vs Jennifer Hiller1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Alice Stubbs vs Elizabeth Hodges / MaryBeth Jackson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-28vs TOC.TedamrongwanishWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadeline Brown / Jennifer Reese vs Jennifer McEntee / Jennifer Hiller0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeatrice Faureng vs Paula Collado Cordon7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Danielle Wilder vs Heather Remley / Laura Alvarez2-6, 6-7
2026-03-14vs TOC.TedamrongwanishLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Elena Wojciechowski vs Leslie Boesch / Jennifer Hiller0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Perry vs Heidi Steiber3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnastasiya Manet / Jennifer Reese vs MacY Fisher / Kelly Moler Glass6-4, 6-1
2026-03-07vs TOC.TedamrongwanishWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Emily Perry vs Elizabeth Hodges / Heather Remley6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMadeline Brown vs Jennifer Hiller6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Wilder / Nena Marks vs Leslie Boesch / Laura Alvarez6-3, 7-5
2026-03-06vs TOC.TedamrongwanishWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Stubbs / Nena Marks vs Jennifer McEntee / Heidi Steiber6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Elizabeth Hodges4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Beatrice Faureng vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish / MaryBeth Jackson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over 5.0 Women Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Day4312923181
2TOC.Tedamrongwanish3491226188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Jeni Burnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.87
Nena Marks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.79
Alice Stubbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.79
Madeline Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.79
Beatrice Faureng
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.69
Anastasiya Manet
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.61
Emily Perry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.54
Elizabeth Speicher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.50
Danielle Wilder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.35
Jennifer Reese
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.32
Julia Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Elena Wojciechowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeni Burnette + Emily Perry7266% games+1.8% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Elizabeth Speicher0638% games−8.4% vs expected
Emily Perry + Alice Stubbs314 matchesnot enough data
Nena Marks + Anastasiya Manet303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jeni Burnette
52W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.96
5
Nena Marks
89W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
5
Alice Stubbs
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
Madeline Brown
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Beatrice Faureng
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Anastasiya Manet
31W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.69
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
Elizabeth Speicher
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
5
Danielle Wilder
229W–112L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.50
Jennifer Reese
29W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Julia Howard
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.32
Elena Wojciechowski
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.