Teams

TOC.Tedamrongwanish

2026 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over 5.0 Women Weekend

11 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-25vs TOC.DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Heidi Steiber vs Beatrice Faureng / Emily Perry2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Hodges vs Elizabeth Speicher6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Paula Collado Cordon vs Julia Howard / Anastasiya Manet0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-18vs TOC.DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesMacY Fisher / Heidi Steiber vs Julia Howard / Nena Marks6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Anastasiya Manet2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Heather Remley vs Jennifer Reese / Elizabeth Speicher6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-11vs TOC.DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Alvarez / Kelly Moler Glass vs Madeline Brown / Elizabeth Speicher2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Hiller vs Danielle Wilder6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hodges / MaryBeth Jackson vs Emily Perry / Alice Stubbs3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-28vs TOC.DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Jennifer Hiller vs Madeline Brown / Jennifer Reese6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Beatrice Faureng5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Laura Alvarez vs Elizabeth Speicher / Danielle Wilder6-2, 7-6
2026-03-14vs TOC.DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Jennifer Hiller vs Jeni Burnette / Elena Wojciechowski6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHeidi Steiber vs Emily Perry6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMacY Fisher / Kelly Moler Glass vs Anastasiya Manet / Jennifer Reese4-6, 1-6
2026-03-07vs TOC.DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hodges / Heather Remley vs Jeni Burnette / Emily Perry2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Hiller vs Madeline Brown7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Laura Alvarez vs Danielle Wilder / Nena Marks3-6, 5-7
2026-03-06vs TOC.DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Heidi Steiber vs Alice Stubbs / Nena Marks3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Hodges vs Anastasiya Manet6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / MaryBeth Jackson vs Elizabeth Speicher / Beatrice Faureng3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over 5.0 Women Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Day4312923181
2TOC.Tedamrongwanish3491226188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.81
Laura Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.80
Elizabeth Hodges
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.67
Heidi Steiber
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.67
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.63
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.51
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Leslie Boesch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.43
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.26
MacY Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Remley + Tanita Tedamrongwanish10653% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Moler Glass + Tanita Tedamrongwanish7159% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Boesch + Heather Remley3455% gamesnot enough data
MaryBeth Jackson + Tanita Tedamrongwanish4257% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Boesch + MaryBeth Jackson3256% gamesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Kelly Moler Glass5059% gamesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Jennifer Hiller123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Paula Collado Cordon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.93
Laura Alvarez
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
Elizabeth Hodges
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.80
Heidi Steiber
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
178W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Kelly Moler Glass
69W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
107W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Leslie Boesch
243W–102L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.43
5
Heather Remley
298W–153L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
MacY Fisher
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.