Teams

BM GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-05vs HRCA-N BRONZEWon 41
W#1 DoublesIan Brown / Jared Wolf vs Phil Braaten / Larry Sevit6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlec Hall vs Stephen Kucharyson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGary Farmar / Peter Malone vs Mike DeSimone / David Kim4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAndrew Milam vs Matt Sfeir6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrew Carlson / Damian Hopper vs Mark Murphy / Joseph Dudek3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Alec Hall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jeffrey Moxon
published
2.86
Todd Hoffman
published
2.85
Jared Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Matt Feldman
published
2.82
Gary Farmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Kevin Fuchs
published
Andrew Milam
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Peter Malone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Gregory Gleason
published 2.5
2.34
Andrew Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Damian Hopper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Scott Humphreys
published
Tyler Williamson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Moxon + Kevin Fuchs15757% games+7.2% vs expected
Gary Farmar + Peter Malone4546% games+0.8% vs expected
Gary Farmar + Damian Hopper1439% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Fuchs + Peter Malone134 matchesnot enough data
Damian Hopper + Scott Humphreys044 matchesnot enough data
Gary Farmar + Andrew Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Gary Farmar + Todd Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Gary Farmar + Gregory Gleason123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alec Hall
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Jeffrey Moxon
27W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Todd Hoffman
32W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jared Wolf
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Matt Feldman
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Gary Farmar
26W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Kevin Fuchs
23W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Andrew Milam
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peter Malone
16W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Gregory Gleason
15W–52L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
2.5
Andrew Carlson
6W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Damian Hopper
2W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Scott Humphreys
0W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Williamson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.