← Search

Tyler Williamson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 14W–13L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history27 matches
W
2025-08-25 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Penaligon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-04 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ian Brown
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-21 · BM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Farmar
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-12 · BM GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-04-28 · BM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Wolf
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-06-02 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Snader mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-12 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Snader mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-05-05 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Snader mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-14 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Snader mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2021-07-27 · High Strung · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carissa Meister mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2021-07-21 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brandi Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2021-07-06 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carissa Meister mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 50.8% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer