← Search

Sarah Snader

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salt Lake City, UT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history11 matches
W
2025-05-28 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Supriya Soni
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-05-14 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celeste Sutton
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-04-30 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Monique Galindo
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-26 · HRCA-N RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celeste Sutton
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-04-16 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-06-02 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyler Williamson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-12 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyler Williamson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-05-05 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyler Williamson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-14 · South Jordan-Higgs/Hall · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyler Williamson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2021-02-06 · Sports Mall-Rollins/Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Armstrong
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-01-30 · Sports Mall-Rollins/Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hailey Garcia
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.9% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert