Teams

LKHA-Hallman/Jetton

2024 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-16vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Jennifer Parker vs Kelly Lesso / Katherine Dugan1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaggie Siebert vs Morgan Hoecherl6-0, 6-1
2024-05-08Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Maggie Siebert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Fontana / Julie Finke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Cortney Griffin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-01vs LJRI-Ritter/Jetton 4.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Julie Finke vs Beth Packard / Sherry Lerme6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Kelly Sanders vs Serena Igharas / Julie Coughlin6-3, 6-1
2024-04-24vs LEKR-Krogstie/CSD Spartan ParkWon 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Michelle Fontana vs Christy Bolick / Nancy Miller6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSamantha Humphreys / Stefanie Flippin vs Jamie Krueger / Becky Heflin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-17vs LNMO-Monacell/ Jetton 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Hannah Weir vs Kelly Stamey / Lisa Carlyle6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Finke / Allison Stearns vs Nicole Monacell / Christine Caruso1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Maggie Siebert vs Jaime Cooper / Bonnie Zentner6-4, 6-2
2024-04-10vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Susan Davis vs Kathleen Navola / Kelly Lesso7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Maggie Siebert vs Anna Bonham / Leta Wiley6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Michelle Fontana vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-09vs LLPA-Pate/NMPWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Samantha Humphreys vs Suzanne Davis / Amanda Childress6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMaggie Siebert vs Emily Heinemann Hamilton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCortney Griffin / Lauren Hession vs Sheryl Beaver / Nathalie Naslund1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Julie Finke vs Karen Dziadziola / Lane Wallace2-6, 6-7
2024-03-20vs LJRI-Ritter/Jetton 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Stefanie Flippin vs Sherry Lerme / Serena Igharas6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Maggie Siebert vs Tabitha Elledge / Jana Ritter7-6, 6-4
2024-03-16vs LNMO-Monacell/ Jetton 4.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Susan Davis vs Kathleen Rissberger / Megan Hartley6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCortney Griffin / Stefanie Flippin vs Jaime Cooper / Allison Terry4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Julie Finke vs Nicole Monacell / Bonnie Zentner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-13vs LEKR-Krogstie/CSD Spartan ParkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Maggie Siebert vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Caroline Pickup4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Humphreys / Stefanie Flippin vs Christy Bolick / Helen Bugg6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kelly Hallman
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.85
Maggie Siebert
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.79
Allison Stearns
published 4
3.77
Michelle Fontana
published
3.75
Stefanie Flippin
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.74
Lauren Hession
published
3.53
Michelle Skaggs
published
3.47
Julie Finke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Cortney Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Fontana + Kelly Hallman5068% games+11.0% vs expected
Kelly Hallman + Maggie Siebert9357% games+6.0% vs expected
Stefanie Flippin + Kelly Hallman181056% games+0.9% vs expected
Cortney Griffin + Kelly Hallman6455% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Cortney Griffin6160% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Maggie Siebert7064% gamesnot enough data
Julie Finke + Stefanie Flippin4258% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Skaggs + Julie Finke314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Maggie Siebert
94W–35L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Allison Stearns
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Michelle Fontana
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Stefanie Flippin
164W–86L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Hession
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Michelle Skaggs
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Julie Finke
122W–96L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Cortney Griffin
156W–91L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.