Teams

Hjelt 40s 4.0M Wed PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-06vs Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bryce / Jason Altmann vs Peter Georges / Chris Keiner6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKENNY GREGSON / Kevin Thoma vs Brian McLeod / Glenn Vainwright6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJosh Ivester / John Kim vs Matthew Skeen / William Farabow3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-22vs Jackson 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesCharles Calkins / John Kim vs Anthony Jackson / Ted Irvin1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Bradley / Amiel Rossabi vs Todd Hurst / Benjamin Schmidt6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Madrazo / Josh Ivester vs Kevin Navarro / Scott Laughlin6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Peter Novosad
published
3.92
Chris Leggette
published 4
3.90
Kevin Thoma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Christopher Bryce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
KENNY GREGSON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Philip Weikel
published
3.82
Jeremy Madrazo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Andrew Hjelt
published 4
3.70
Amiel Rossabi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Charles Calkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
E P Forehand
published
3.63
Josh Ivester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Barbee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Thoma + KENNY GREGSON10264% games+7.5% vs expected
Kevin Thoma + Amiel Rossabi314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Hjelt + Amiel Rossabi314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Thoma + Christopher Bryce213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.03
Peter Novosad
39W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Chris Leggette
18W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kevin Thoma
32W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Christopher Bryce
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
KENNY GREGSON
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Philip Weikel
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Jeremy Madrazo
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Andrew Hjelt
24W–27L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amiel Rossabi
20W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Charles Calkins
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
E P Forehand
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Josh Ivester
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
Matthew Barbee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.