Teams

CPV GREEN

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-07vs CR-DC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Henry / Alexis Tibar vs Matthew Travis / Mark McCullough6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBill Aplin vs Brian O'Sullivan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLon Stuebinger / Michael Hance vs Derek Mullner / MJ Kawamoto1-6, 5-7
2025-09-02vs SS-LT BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesBill Henry / Jim Shalvoy vs Jason Kinsey / Prasenjit Mitra3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlexis Tibar vs Sandeep Ramineni6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBill Aplin / Michael Hance vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-19vs PRC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLon Stuebinger vs Jay Griebling2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Hance / Jim Shalvoy vs Matthew Montoya / DAVID DALESSANDRO6-2, 7-5
2025-08-12vs CR-DC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesBill Aplin / Michael Vernon vs Justin Laughlin / Brad Dunning7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlexis Tibar vs Michael Huynh6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Hance / Jim Shalvoy vs John Hagan / Kurt Delos Trino1-6, 6-7
2025-08-06Won 20
W#1 SinglesAlexis Tibar vs Charles Cook4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLon Stuebinger / Bill Aplin vs Karsten Baker / Jared Syke5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-05vs HRCA-S GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLon Stuebinger / Bill Henry vs John Guzak / Sean Knudson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexis Tibar vs Daniel Reynoso6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Hance / Jim Shalvoy vs Brandon Dale / Frank Johns6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jim Shalvoy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Alexis Tibar
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Bill Aplin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Michael Hance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lon Stuebinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Mike Mantey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Shalvoy + Lon Stuebinger3258% games+8.3% vs expected
Jim Shalvoy + Michael Hance213 matchesnot enough data
Jim Shalvoy + Bill Aplin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jim Shalvoy
32W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Alexis Tibar
16W–10L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Bill Aplin
72W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Michael Hance
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Lon Stuebinger
78W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Mike Mantey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.