Teams

HRCA-S GREEN

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-02vs CR-DC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / John Belcher vs Barry Shockley / Alex Mostrowski6-3, 7-6
2025-08-26vs PRC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandon Dale / John Belcher vs Jay Griebling / Surya Susarla3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / Sean Knudson vs DAVID DALESSANDRO / Matthew Montoya7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-19vs CR-DC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / John Guzak vs Alex Villwock / Brad Dunning3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesFrank Johns / Brandon Dale vs Kurt Delos Trino / John Hagan4-6, 4-6
2025-08-05vs CPV GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Guzak / Sean Knudson vs Lon Stuebinger / Bill Henry7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandon Dale / Frank Johns vs Michael Hance / Jim Shalvoy4-6, 6-7
2025-07-29vs VCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Belcher / Daniel Bruetting vs William Stoughton / Brian Fisher6-4, 7-5
2025-07-28vs SS-LT BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / Sean Knudson vs Balakrishnan Jayasankar / Sandeep Ramineni4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Guzak / Frank Johns vs Raghav Dube / Jason Kinsey6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Daniel Bruetting
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
John Belcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
John Guzak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Sean Knudson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Frank Johns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Guzak + Daniel Bruetting2845% games−1.2% vs expected
John Guzak + John Belcher0540% gamesnot enough data
John Belcher + Daniel Bruetting2343% gamesnot enough data
John Guzak + Frank Johns033 matchesnot enough data
Sean Knudson + Daniel Bruetting033 matchesnot enough data
Frank Johns + Daniel Bruetting033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Bruetting
40W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
John Belcher
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
John Guzak
40W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Sean Knudson
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Frank Johns
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.