Teams

VCC RED

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-08vs SS-LT BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJake Dosen / Blair Gifford vs Prasenjit Mitra / Vikram Gulia3-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs CR-DC REDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCharles Cook vs Brian O'Sullivan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartin Atlas / John Nichols vs Matthew Travis / MJ Kawamoto4-6, 1-6
2025-08-12vs PRC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesBlair Gifford / Charles Cook vs Jay Griebling / Shea Yates6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJake Dosen vs Jordan Rigberg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartin Atlas / Brian Fisher vs DAVID DALESSANDRO / Matthew Montoya6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-06vs CPV GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesCharles Cook vs Alexis Tibar6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-05vs CR-DC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMartin Atlas / John Nichols vs Alex Villwock / Brad Dunning2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJake Dosen vs Darren Johnson6-3, 7-6
2025-07-29vs HRCA-S GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Stoughton / Brian Fisher vs John Belcher / Daniel Bruetting4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesCharles Cook vs Brandon Dale6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Charles Cook
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Martin Atlas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Blair Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jake Dosen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Michael Talaga
published
William Stoughton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Gifford + William Stoughton3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Cook
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Martin Atlas
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Blair Gifford
61W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Jake Dosen
17W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Michael Talaga
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Stoughton
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.