Teams

SFV - Simply Smashing 3.5

2023 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-02vs SFV - Hit 'Em UpLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargie Englis / Theresa Sterling vs Tanya Robinson / Jady Vonderlieth2-6, 2-6
2023-11-19vs SFV - Baby Got BackhandWon 10
W#3 DoublesCecilia Mikaelian / CHERYL KEEHNE vs Leslie Giammanco / Sara Gabriel6-1, 6-3
2023-10-28vs SFV - BabeolatsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Mac Ewan / Margie Englis vs Madi Rosenberg / Tara Sickmeier2-6, 0-6
2023-09-17vs SFV - Paseo TribeLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Lewis / CHERYL KEEHNE vs Jenny Ulch / Meri Vitiello2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.69
Summer Williamson
published
3.68
Jenny Isaacson
published
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.08
Theresa Sterling
published
3.05
Janine Baker
published
3.01
Mary Anna Noveck
published
2.96
CHERYL KEEHNE
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Amanjot Bawa
published 3
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.60
Vanessa Nelson
published
Neva Lequin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Mikaelian
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
Summer Williamson
48W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.69
Jenny Isaacson
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Janine Baker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Mary Anna Noveck
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
CHERYL KEEHNE
42W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Amanjot Bawa
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Neva Lequin
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.