Teams

NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC

2025 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-22vs NNM/Emmons/Adult65&Over/8.0WWCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Smith / Jo Ann Erikson vs Wendy Thomas / Shawn Brennan6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRomela Carman / Debra Bryan vs Barbara Emmons / Karwyn Gustafson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJill Sanchez / Kathy Swanson vs Susan Beavis / Diane Kinderwater6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRayme Romanik / Janet Smith vs Kelly Cain / Laurie Byrne6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSandra Postel / Kathy Swanson vs Nancy Keeran / Virginia Henry6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSchoonover Jones / Debra Bryan vs Jennifer Lind / Laurie Hofmann6-3, 6-2
2025-10-13vs NNM/Emmons/Adult65&Over/8.0WWCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Sanchez / Sandra Postel vs Barbara Emmons / Wendy Thomas6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRayme Romanik / Jo Ann Erikson vs Shawn Brennan / Becky Mcclain7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJudy Fleischman / Schoonover Jones vs Sahreem Luergan / Susan Beavis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-01vs NNM/Emmons/Adult65&Over/8.0WWCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorraine Gullett / Marlene Carrejo vs Wendy Thomas / Becky Mcclain6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Fleischman / Debra Bryan vs Barbara Emmons / Karwyn Gustafson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Postel / Romela Carman vs Sahreem Luergan / Diane Kinderwater6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLorraine Gullett / Marlene Carrejo vs Carol Ydens / Karen Domenici6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJill Sanchez / Judy Fleischman vs Kelly Cain / Jennifer Lind6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSchoonover Jones / Kathy Swanson vs Anna Hargreaves / Shirley McDougall7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLorraine Gullett / Rayme Romanik vs Laurie Byrne / Kelly Cain6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Sanchez / Sandra Postel vs Ellen Parker / Laurie Hofmann6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSchoonover Jones / Kathy Swanson vs Nancy Keeran / Anna Hargreaves4-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs NNM/Emmons/Adult65&Over/8.0WWCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorraine Gullett / Jo Ann Erikson vs Sahreem Luergan / Susan Beavis6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Sanchez / Judy Fleischman vs Donna Steege / Barbara Shulman6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesRayme Romanik / Janet Smith vs Kelly Cain / Laurie Byrne3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLorraine Gullett / Marlene Carrejo vs Jennifer Lind / Laurie Hofmann6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Postel / Debra Bryan vs Anna Hargreaves / Shirley McDougall6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC7118613152
2NNM/Emmons/Adult65&Over/8.0WWC44111330234
3NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Lind - EG1771736253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Lorraine Gullett
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.90
Sandra Postel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Marlene Carrejo
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.59
Debra Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Jill Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Jo Ann Erikson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Smith
published
Judy Fleischman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Swanson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rayme Romanik
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Romela Carman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Schoonover Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Sanchez + Kathy Swanson17168% games+11.1% vs expected
Marlene Carrejo + Jo Ann Erikson11069% games+7.2% vs expected
Kathy Swanson + Schoonover Jones251158% games+4.7% vs expected
Jill Sanchez + Sandra Postel7657% games+1.5% vs expected
Jill Sanchez + Judy Fleischman3355% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Gullett + Rayme Romanik5167% gamesnot enough data
Schoonover Jones + Debra Bryan3259% gamesnot enough data
Schoonover Jones + Judy Fleischman2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorraine Gullett
51W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Sandra Postel
79W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Marlene Carrejo
77W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Debra Bryan
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Jill Sanchez
70W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Jo Ann Erikson
112W–80L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Janet Smith
50W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Fleischman
55W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Swanson
68W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rayme Romanik
49W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Romela Carman
57W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Schoonover Jones
70W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.