Teams

Hermitage Lines Ladies 6.0

2022 Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League · Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-05-16vs Salisbury JamisonWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesAMY LINES / Alexia Gerczak vs Erin Garrett / Kimberly Means6-4, 6-3
2022-04-24vs Bon Air FenstermacherWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAMY LINES / Lauren Hutcheson vs Debra Flight / Kristen Powers6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Andrea Broughton
published 3.5
3.25
Thu-Hang Groome
published
3.15
Lauren Hutcheson
published
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
2.68
Alexia Gerczak
published 3
2.61
Alison Chesson
published 3
2.61
Leah Donham
published
2.47
Wendy Stone
published
2.40
Virginia Cochran
published
2.40
Vanessa Dambrosia
published
2.23
Margaretha Valderas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Thu-Hang Groome
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.15
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Alexia Gerczak
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Alison Chesson
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
Leah Donham
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
0%19%81%
2.61
Wendy Stone
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
Virginia Cochran
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.40
Vanessa Dambrosia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.40
Margaretha Valderas
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.