Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Kelly

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-13vs OC DHTC - Lynn - 1030Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Duenas / Missy Berchiolli vs Lynn Kamada / Tracy Brennan6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelby Houle / Michelle Frohlich vs Sue Shin / Diane Dupuy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Stacy / Tracey Fulford vs Denise Banks / Bonnie Davis7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Antoine / Melissa Hill vs Judy Khang / Linda Luk6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-09-27vs OC Costa Mesa TC - SabrinaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Fisher / Elisabeth Antoine vs Liz Kirksey / Jill Brown6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Angie Fisher
published 4
3.98
Elisabeth Antoine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Christine Parry
published 4
3.69
Michelle Duenas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Ladawn Stone
published
3.60
Missy Berchiolli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Michelle Frohlich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kathy Salter
published
3.47
Jessica Papell
published
3.44
Shelby Houle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Kelly Stacy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Christine Griffith
published 3.5
3.25
Melissa Hill
published
Tracey Fulford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Bennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Duenas + Kathy Salter4354% games+8.9% vs expected
Christine Griffith + Missy Berchiolli4844% games−1.8% vs expected
Kathy Salter + Kelly Stacy314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Griffith + Michelle Frohlich033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Fisher
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
4.08
4
Elisabeth Antoine
27W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Christine Parry
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Duenas
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Ladawn Stone
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Missy Berchiolli
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Michelle Frohlich
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Kathy Salter
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Jessica Papell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Shelby Houle
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kelly Stacy
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Christine Griffith
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Melissa Hill
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.25
Tracey Fulford
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Bennett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.