Teams

OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-Ng 9:30am

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-06vs OC NBTC - DonnaWon 10
W#3 DoublesSa Cool / Athena Wong vs Donna Cox / Nedra Jenkins6-1, 6-0
2024-11-22vs OC Yorba Linda CC- HollyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSa Cool / Paula Nishibayashi vs Melinda Chu / Aimee Firouznam6-4, 6-3
2024-11-15vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyLost 01
L#3 DoublesSa Cool / Cindy Lai vs Kelly Stacy / Kathy Salter3-6, 4-6
2024-10-25vs OC Coto De Caza - TracieLost 01
L#3 DoublesSa Cool / Nannette Diesen-Ng vs Kathy Warren / Karah Curtis5-7, 5-7
2024-09-27vs OC Dana Hills - Dara - 1030Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSa Cool / Cindy Lai vs Lyndsay Boberg / Jodi Mitchell1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Rachel Om
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.85
Amy Huynh
published 4
3.74
Judy Khang
published
3.74
Diane Kimbro
published 4
3.72
Michele Savoie
published
3.71
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.64
Sunny Park
published
3.57
Paula Nishibayashi
usually #3 Doubles 90%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.57
Athena Wong
published 4
3.55
Linda Luk
published
3.54
Sharon Fujihara
published
3.43
Sa Cool
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Cindy Lai
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Savoie + Sabrina MacLachlan8353% games+6.0% vs expected
Sa Cool + Paula Nishibayashi123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Savoie + Amy Huynh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachel Om
166W–64L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Amy Huynh
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Judy Khang
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Diane Kimbro
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Michele Savoie
21W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 13 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Sunny Park
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Paula Nishibayashi
92W–73L career · 10 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Athena Wong
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Linda Luk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sharon Fujihara
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Sa Cool
37W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Cindy Lai
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.