Team 14 Laurel White/Michaela Cady
2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 7.5W
8 players · average NTRP — / TEXAS
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule4 played
i
Flight standings15 teams · 7.5W
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Team 2 Tara Murphy 7.5W | 2 | 0 | 2 | 45 |
| 2Team 12 Kerrie Stephanian 7.5W | 2 | 0 | 5 | 39 |
| 3Team 4 Tina Hoang/Julie Hoang 7.5W | 2 | 0 | 5 | 55 |
| 4Team 11 Jennifer Richter 7.5W | 2 | 1 | 9 | 84 |
| 5Team 6 Natalie Gilbert 7.5W | 1 | 0 | 3 | 19 |
| 6Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W | 1 | 1 | 7 | 59 |
| 7Team 7 Vicki Rose/Lori Bennett 7.5W | 1 | 1 | 7 | 52 |
| 8Team 1 Yvette Freeman 7.5W | 1 | 1 | 8 | 59 |
| 9Team 5 Kim Combs 7.5W | 1 | 1 | 9 | 63 |
| 10Team 14 Laurel White/Michaela Cady | 1 | 2 | 9 | 83 |
| 11Team 13 Jana Labra 7.5W | 1 | 2 | 9 | 78 |
| 12Team 10 Cynthia Wilder/Jen Mulhern 7.5W | 1 | 2 | 12 | 87 |
| 13Team 3 Cheryl Bradley 7.5W | 0 | 1 | 5 | 35 |
| 14Team 15 Eva Paharik 7.5W | 0 | 2 | 10 | 65 |
| 15Team 8 Sandra Anderson/Margaret Hoyt 7.5W | 0 | 2 | 11 | 70 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Emily Ullom + Michaela Cady | 2–4 | 47% games | not enough data |
| Michaela Cady + Duygu Uzun | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.