Teams

Team 11 Jennifer Richter 7.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 7.5W

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs Team 2 Tara Murphy 7.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Hashimoto / Stephanie King vs Tara Murphy / Diem Thi Tran4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBritney Tran / Ella Li vs Lachrista Whatley / Casey Carlson7-5, 4-3
W#3 DoublesJamie Debusk-Loop / Jennifer Richter vs Heather Graham / Jenna Dinh7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLiliann Nguyen / Ella Li vs Emma Tobin / Serap Karayigen6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBritney Tran / Laura Rich vs Michaela Cady / Duygu Uzun7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Helen Nine / Heidi Aiken vs Ronnie Bye / Laurel White1-6, 3-6
2026-08-21vs Team 5 Kim Combs 7.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Debusk-Loop / Heidi Aiken vs Suzi Donaghe / Allison Waldron4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBritney Tran / Jennifer Richter vs Kim Combs / Cassedy Crawford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiliann Nguyen / Ella Li vs Nancy Myers / Laya Gan6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesLiliann Nguyen / Laura Rich vs Laura Flores / Donna Schoolfield2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBritney Tran / Jennifer Richter vs Nicole Eschliman / Summer Richbourg6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHa Tran / Stephanie King vs Donna Moses / Margaret Hoyt7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 7.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 2 Tara Murphy 7.5W2051245
2Team 12 Kerrie Stephanian 7.5W2042539
3Team 4 Tina Hoang/Julie Hoang 7.5W2051555
4Team 11 Jennifer Richter 7.5W2154984
5Team 6 Natalie Gilbert 7.5W1021319
6Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W1133759
7Team 7 Vicki Rose/Lori Bennett 7.5W1133752
8Team 1 Yvette Freeman 7.5W1124859
9Team 5 Kim Combs 7.5W1124963
10Team 14 Laurel White/Michaela Cady1254983
11Team 13 Jana Labra 7.5W1254978
12Team 10 Cynthia Wilder/Jen Mulhern 7.5W12361287
13Team 3 Cheryl Bradley 7.5W0112535
14Team 15 Eva Paharik 7.5W02241065
15Team 8 Sandra Anderson/Margaret Hoyt 7.5W02151170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Britney Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Ha Tran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Jamie Debusk-Loop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Liliann Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Diane Hashimoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ella Li
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Mary Helen Nine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Heidi Aiken
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Richter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ha Tran + Jamie Debusk-Loop3453% games−2.5% vs expected
Diane Hashimoto + Ha Tran3649% games−4.6% vs expected
Diane Hashimoto + Jamie Debusk-Loop3348% games−16.4% vs expected
Jennifer Richter + Mary Helen Nine0531% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Britney Tran
10W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Ha Tran
26W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
Jamie Debusk-Loop
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Liliann Nguyen
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Diane Hashimoto
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Ella Li
30W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Mary Helen Nine
6W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.44
Heidi Aiken
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Richter
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.