Teams

KY/LEX/Baker/Nakanishi

2023 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Katie Parrish
published
3.76
Ileana Contreras
published
3.61
Kathryn Whiteman
published
3.40
Emily Diehl
published
3.30
Ikuko Nakanishi
published
3.27
Mary Cole
published
Catherine Sauvage
published 3.5
Christy Ellis
published 3.5
3.23
Katherine Hornback
published
3.13
Mary Diggins
published
3.09
Martha Martin
published
Kay Yates
published
Lola Baker
published
Nina Begley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lola Baker + Ikuko Nakanishi213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Diggins + Nina Begley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Parrish
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
Ileana Contreras
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
Kathryn Whiteman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Ikuko Nakanishi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.30
Mary Cole
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Sauvage
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christy Ellis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Hornback
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Mary Diggins
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Martha Martin
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
Kay Yates
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lola Baker
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nina Begley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.