Teams

SD 3.0 BTC Sat Smashers (Sat 2:30PM)/ Gyure

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Women 3.0 GNO

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · SD Women 3.0 GNO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 3.0 BTC Sat Smashers (Sat 2:30PM)/ Gyure000000
2SD 3.0 Mtn View (Sat 2:30)/ Dunlap000000
3SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Oliva000000
4SD 3.0 SDTRC (Sat 2:30)/ Kleiner000000
5SD 3.0 SDTRC (Sat 2:30)/ Ross000000
6SD 3.0 LJTC (Sat 2:30)/ Covello000000
7SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Enwright000000
8SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Hagstrom000000
9SD 3.0 Balboa TC (Sat 2:30)/ La Crue000000
10SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (noon)/ Nguyen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Candace Gyure
published 3
2.88
Molly Sterner
published
2.88
Malinda Marsh
published 3
2.88
Irena Hukari
published 3
2.86
Michele Kelley
published
2.84
Anja Dixson
published 3
2.80
Amy Rorstad
published 3
2.80
Amy Shapiro
published 3
2.78
Christy Carreno
published 3
2.73
Rebecca Lawrence
published
2.72
Dianne Golingan
published 3
2.71
Cathy Edwards
published 3
Susan Gammon
published
Valerie Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Golingan + Amy Rorstad71248% games−6.0% vs expected
Irena Hukari + Amy Rorstad2441% gamesnot enough data
Dianne Golingan + Malinda Marsh2354% gamesnot enough data
Michele Kelley + Amy Rorstad303 matchesnot enough data
Candace Gyure + Amy Rorstad123 matchesnot enough data
Candace Gyure + Malinda Marsh033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Rorstad + Molly Sterner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Candace Gyure
128W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Molly Sterner
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Malinda Marsh
83W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Irena Hukari
42W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Michele Kelley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Anja Dixson
43W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Amy Rorstad
82W–150L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy Shapiro
14W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christy Carreno
20W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Rebecca Lawrence
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Dianne Golingan
22W–50L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Cathy Edwards
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Susan Gammon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Garcia
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.