Teams

SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Oliva

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Women 3.0 GNO

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · SD Women 3.0 GNO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 3.0 BTC Sat Smashers (Sat 2:30PM)/ Gyure000000
2SD 3.0 Mtn View (Sat 2:30)/ Dunlap000000
3SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Oliva000000
4SD 3.0 SDTRC (Sat 2:30)/ Kleiner000000
5SD 3.0 SDTRC (Sat 2:30)/ Ross000000
6SD 3.0 LJTC (Sat 2:30)/ Covello000000
7SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Enwright000000
8SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (Sat 2:30)/ Hagstrom000000
9SD 3.0 Balboa TC (Sat 2:30)/ La Crue000000
10SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (noon)/ Nguyen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Philip Mykel Flores
published
2.91
2.85
Stacy Tomita
published
2.74
Miriam Mceachern
published 2.5
2.73
Jessica Bunster
published
2.68
Jessica Levie
published
2.68
Micaela Banach
published 3
2.67
Michelle Milbury
published
2.56
Jill Bruckart
published
2.54
Ashley Ragsdale
published 3
2.45
Corrine Lott
published 2.5
2.43
Michelle Anilao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicia Danielle Oliva + Michelle Milbury5355% games−1.3% vs expected
Corrine Lott + Miriam Mceachern224 matchesnot enough data
Miriam Mceachern + Jessica Bunster404 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Bunster + Jill Bruckart404 matchesnot enough data
Corrine Lott + Michelle Anilao213 matchesnot enough data
Corrine Lott + Jessica Bunster303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Milbury + Michelle Anilao303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Mykel Flores
11W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Felicia Danielle Oliva
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Stacy Tomita
18W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
2.5
Miriam Mceachern
41W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.74
Jessica Bunster
13W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Jessica Levie
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Micaela Banach
35W–25L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Michelle Milbury
13W–8L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Jill Bruckart
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.56
3
Ashley Ragsdale
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
2.5
Corrine Lott
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Michelle Anilao
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.