Teams

Green - Tri-Level 18s 3.5/4.0/4.5

2022 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeah Weinberger / Janel Green vs Maggie Riley / Ai Terui4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLeah Weinberger / Anna Tomkins vs Mimi Cartee / Kim Haynes6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-11vs Abraham - Tri-Level 18s 3.5/4.0/4.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesMeghan Zerkel / Lauren Bolger vs Blair Barnett / Anna Magrini6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBridget Crump / Myra Propst vs Kara Jacobs / Leigh Abraham3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
4.24
Meghan Zerkel
published
4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.75
Leah Weinberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Lauren Bolger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.14
Connie Song
published 3.5
3.00
Rebekah East
published
3.00
Medy Wurth
published
2.89
Janice Wilkinson
published
Bridget Crump
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Linda Shuster
published
Janel Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Weinberger + Anna Tomkins10168% gamesnot enough data
Medy Wurth + Janice Wilkinson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elizabeth Speicher
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
Meghan Zerkel
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Leah Weinberger
358W–284L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Lauren Bolger
94W–77L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Connie Song
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Rebekah East
27W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Medy Wurth
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Janice Wilkinson
11W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Bridget Crump
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Myra Propst
147W–178L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Linda Shuster
19W–24L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Janel Green
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.