Teams

Inman

2026 NE Mixed 40&Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-03vs HollandLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Brailita / Jodi Zmiewski vs Danielle Parde / John Klotz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Inman / Monica Miles-steffens vs Michelle Holland / Emir Plicanic5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Koebernick / John Morehouse vs Erica Heninger / Viktor Khanzhyn4-6, 2-6
2026-03-20vs HollandLost 12
L#1 DoublesJodi Zmiewski / Daniel Brailita vs Carmen Kelle / Emir Plicanic4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLarisa Andreeva / Alan Givens vs Michelle Holland / Xu Li6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Koebernick / Dan Inman vs Erica Heninger / Viktor Khanzhyn6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-13vs HollandLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlan Givens / Larisa Andreeva vs Erica Heninger / Viktor Khanzhyn5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDan Inman / Lisa Hoffman vs Carmen Kelle / Xu Li3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJodi Zmiewski / Daniel Brailita vs Danielle Parde / John Klotz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-06vs HollandLost 02
L#1 DoublesMonica Miles-steffens / Dan Inman vs Danielle Parde / John Klotz3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Koebernick / John Morehouse vs Michelle Holland / Xu Li3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Holland40102787
2Inman0421022134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Daniel Brailita
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Larisa Andreeva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Dan Inman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Alan Givens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
Jodi Zmiewski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.21
Sarah Koebernick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Morehouse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Hoffman
published
Monica Miles-steffens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Siobhan Ebers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Brailita + Jodi Zmiewski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Brailita
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Larisa Andreeva
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
3
Dan Inman
5W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Alan Givens
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Jodi Zmiewski
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Sarah Koebernick
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
John Morehouse
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Hoffman
1W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Miles-steffens
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Siobhan Ebers
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.