Teams

Holland

2026 NE Mixed 40&Over · 6.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-03vs InmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Parde / John Klotz vs Daniel Brailita / Jodi Zmiewski6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Holland / Emir Plicanic vs Dan Inman / Monica Miles-steffens7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErica Heninger / Viktor Khanzhyn vs Sarah Koebernick / John Morehouse6-4, 6-2
2026-03-20vs InmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarmen Kelle / Emir Plicanic vs Jodi Zmiewski / Daniel Brailita6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Holland / Xu Li vs Larisa Andreeva / Alan Givens2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErica Heninger / Viktor Khanzhyn vs Sarah Koebernick / Dan Inman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-13vs InmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesErica Heninger / Viktor Khanzhyn vs Alan Givens / Larisa Andreeva7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarmen Kelle / Xu Li vs Dan Inman / Lisa Hoffman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanielle Parde / John Klotz vs Jodi Zmiewski / Daniel Brailita2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-06vs InmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Parde / John Klotz vs Monica Miles-steffens / Dan Inman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Holland / Xu Li vs Sarah Koebernick / John Morehouse6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Holland40102787
2Inman0421022134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Emir Plicanic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.61
John Klotz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Xu Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Danielle Parde
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Carmen Kelle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Michelle Holland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Erica Heninger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Viktor Khanzhyn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Klotz + Danielle Parde2441% gamesnot enough data
Xu Li + Michelle Holland2339% gamesnot enough data
Erica Heninger + Viktor Khanzhyn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emir Plicanic
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
John Klotz
8W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Xu Li
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Danielle Parde
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Carmen Kelle
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
Michelle Holland
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Erica Heninger
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Viktor Khanzhyn
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.