Teams

1-ELinnander-Singles-SVC

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-25vs 5-CCouto-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEve Hammett vs Beth Huebner3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Ginny Kirk Andrews6-1, 6-2
2023-07-13vs 2-KPollak-Eno-18+Won 20
W#2 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Betsy Shane6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEve Hammett vs Anna Brown6-1, 6-4
2023-07-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Carrie Guthrie6-3, 7-6
2023-06-28vs 5-CCouto-HRWon 10
W#2 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Katie Neal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-09vs 3-HRoss-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEve Hammett vs Anna Tomkins0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Beth O'Donnell6-1, 2-1
2023-06-06vs 2-KPollak-Eno-18+Split 11
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Sindhu Shivaji6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEve Hammett vs Laura Williams4-6, 2-6
2023-05-23vs 4-LStraube-Eno-Singles-18 4.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Hannah Silverstein6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEve Hammett vs Hillary Mulder6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesChristine Sudzina Schut vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Suyeon Kim
published
3.83
Tiffany Langino
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.58
Erika Linnander
published
3.54
Eve Hammett
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Christine Sudzina Schut
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Coward
published 3.5
3.23
Anne Stephens
published 3.5
3.16
Blair Kelly
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Sudzina Schut + Tiffany Langino8262% games+11.5% vs expected
Christine Sudzina Schut + Melissa Coward13559% games+1.1% vs expected
Eve Hammett + Tiffany Langino452955% games−1.7% vs expected
Tiffany Langino + Melissa Coward4354% gamesnot enough data
Eve Hammett + Melissa Coward314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Sudzina Schut + Eve Hammett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suyeon Kim
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.83
Erika Linnander
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Eve Hammett
132W–82L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Christine Sudzina Schut
149W–88L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anne Stephens
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Blair Kelly
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.